HERALDO DE ARAGON, 25 Jan 90
Zaragoza
Literary Truths & Lies
by Ana Maria Navales

There are two kinds of literature. One helps you to understand,
the other helps you to forget; the first helps you to be a free
person and a free citizen, the other helps people to manipulate
you. The Hungarian writer Stephen Vizinezey, exiled first to Canada
and now resident in London, writes this in his book Truth &
Lies in Literature. It is important not to forget that truth.
When Vizinczey published his first novel, In Praise of Older Women
(1965), most of the critics received it with hostility or silence.
The novel has now gone through more than forty editions and its
sales continue to rise. This reminds us how. eternally wrong literary
critics tend to be. The profile of Sainte-Beuve, a very authoritative
critic of the 19th century who never took notice of the works of
Stendhal (for whom this was 'a punishment equivalent to being ignored
by all the quality papers and television') leads us into the portrait
of the renowned critic as charlatan. 'Regarded as the champion of
literature, he is in fact its deadliest enemy, depriving the best
writers of their audience and readers of the best writing, and doing
this mainly by virtue of his position, because readers are only
too inclined to take his opinion on trust'. A schematic and accurate
identikit-picture.
Needless to say, the author of An Innocent Millionaire, this Hungarian
who wields a pen like a scalpel, is also a literary critic. But
'he is not a graduate of the milk-and-water school of criticism,
content to write elegant, urbane disquisitions on this or that,
a mandarin of the literary tradition' his editor Christopher Sinclair-Stevenson
explains to us. No, indeed. Vizinczey's three great authors, Stendhal,
falzae and Kleist, appear in this book, intelligently analyzed,
alongside Tolstoy, Gogol, Nerval, Thomas Mann, Norman Mailer and
some others, who form the constellation that illuminates the literary
world of this Hungarian who loves words and hates fraud, who sharpens
his critical weapons and makes them shine by the light of his intelligence,
with bravery and not too much acidity.
His essays go beyond the field of literature and tackle the great
themes of religion and politics, cruelty and death, everything that
can interest this restless and reflective man, this man who 'writes
like an angel' and is always committing outrages against the official
guardians of literature. In every culture there exists a deep divide
between what is alive and what is praiseworthy, he says speaking
of Kleist, who was already attacking the tittle-tattle of critics
at the beginning of the last century, the great Prussian writer
who was poor and unsuccessful and ended by committing suicide, and
was acclaimed only after his death.
The prologue to the book reproduces A Writer's Ten Commandments,
those tablets of the law in which Vizinczey gives practical advice
to beginners. Each commandment has a corresponding gloss which deserves
some emphasis: 'A writer is born from talent and time' or 'The provincial
is usually an intelligent, gifted person who ends up... betraying
his talent by aping morons whose only talent is forrgetting on',
or 'You've got to decide what is more important to you: to live
well or to write well'.
As for basic literature on the writer's life, Vizinczey recommends
the preface to Shaw's Dark Lady of the Sonnets, Jack London's Martin
Eden, Virginia Woolf's A Room of One's Own and above all Baizac's
Lost Illusions. To this list one would have to add some chapters
from his own book of reviews and essays which show how the writer
has illuminated his own room in the world of literature, its lights
and its shadows.
Let us end with this paragraph on the multiple reincarnation of
Sainte-Beuve: 'We see Sainte-Beuves on all the review pages, praising
the spurious, the innocuous, the pretentious, and damning everything
that is truthful, lively, passionate, unruly - anything that might
move you deeply and stir you to think - anything that might change
you. Because if you change, who knows, the world might change -
and that must not be.'
by Ana Maria Navales


|